<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN"
        "http://www.rssboard.org/rss-0.91.dtd">
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>SAPIENS - recent articles</title>
        <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/</link>
        <description>Recent articles of the journal Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society</description>
        <language>en</language>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Darwinian storied residence: an introduction to the work of Holmes Rolston III]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/117/2008/sapiens-1-117-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Darwinian storied residence: an introduction to the work of Holmes Rolston III
                    H.-S. Afeissa
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 117-124, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-117-2008, 2008
                        A key issue of environmental ethics is to identify intrinsic objects of
valuation within the natural environment. Such intrinsic natural values are
fundamental prerequisites to frame moral obligations to nature. This paper
gives a global perspective on Holmes Rolston's philosophy. By deploying the
evolutionary history of life on earth, Rolston draws attention to the
formidable creativity which drives it so that it commands respect and admiration. This paper contends that
his work lies at the intersection of epistemology of natural sciences, moral
philosophy and religious studies. The Darwinian model is used to define the
main thematic concepts in Rolston's philosophy and, in greater depth, the
general trend of his thinking.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Safety standards: an urgent need for Evidence-Based Regulation]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/105/2008/sapiens-1-105-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Safety standards: an urgent need for Evidence-Based Regulation
                    P. Kourilsky and I. Giri
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 105-115, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-105-2008, 2008
                        "Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of
current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual
patients." (Sackett et al., 1996).


This opinion article describes and analyses some of the consequences of the
ever-growing stringency of regulatory standards in the field of drugs and
vaccines for human health, with distinct issues in the developed and
developing countries. It is argued that the cost and benefit of safety
standards, prior and after implementation, are not sufficiently evaluated,
nor sufficiently informed by science. We suspect that, as a result,
significant amounts of public and private money might be misspent, because
assessments of risks/benefits are often questionable, sometimes out of
context and inadequate. It is suggested that, just as it happened in
medicine 30 years ago, a move towards Evidence-Based Regulation should be
promoted. Given the probable and predictable negative impacts on costs and
innovation, both in developed and developing countries – particularly in the
latter where the needs are huge and the resources highly limited – we contend
that such a move is urgently needed.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Future scenarios as a tool for collaboration in forest communities]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/97/2008/sapiens-1-97-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Future scenarios as a tool for collaboration in forest communities
                    K. Evans, W. de Jong, and P. Cronkleton
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 97-103, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-97-2008, 2008
                        Forest devolution is meant to provide communities with greater
decision-making power over the use and future of tropical forests. However,
devolution policies have not always had the intended effect; in some cases
they have caused or furthered the disenfranchisement of the poor, the
creation of open access conditions, resource conflict and forest
degradation. These problems are likely to arise when forest communities are
at a disadvantage when interacting with other local players and are
unprepared for their new opportunities and responsibilities due to their
physical remoteness, cultural isolation, low literacy rates or lack of
experience in formal planning and negotiation. This paper discusses how a
participatory method to facilitate thinking about the future – called future
scenarios – can help change the way forest communities and local governments
interact. The paper reviews a growing body of literature on future scenarios
and shares first-hand experiences with future scenarios in forest
communities in the northern Bolivian Amazon and the central provinces of
Vietnam. It finds that under the right conditions, the use of future
scenarios allows forest communities to collaborate more effectively with
local government, better assume responsibilities when given control over
forests under devolution schemes and self-organize to benefit from the
opportunities that communal control over forests offers. Future scenarios
help communities think about dependency, vulnerabilities and ways to prepare
for the future; the methods develop organizational capacity and encourage
internal democratic processes and planning. Community leaders become more
vocal and assertive in meetings with local government, and marginalized
groups within communities, such as women or the poorest segments, make their
voices heard. However, the methods are less effective when facilitation
skills are not available or where government or other interests are
threatened by local constituents. Future scenarios are not without their
pitfalls and do not work in all situations, but given the appropriate
context they can create "break-through moments" that improve collaboration
between communities and local officials.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The current electrical revolution: portrait of a newly emerging architecture in industrialized countries]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/87/2008/sapiens-1-87-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    The current electrical revolution: portrait of a newly emerging architecture in industrialized countries
                    P. Dunsky
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 87-96, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-87-2008, 2008
                        In the short and medium terms, the precise architecture
of the industrial world's electricity system remains hazy. Yet in the long
term, it seems quite clearly headed toward a new configuration, rooted in a
triad of solid trends: miniaturization, decentralization and the
"greening'' of power generation. This text describes and explains these
trends and their underlying forces, namely the combined effects of
technological progress, growing environmental consciousness, the advent of a
digital economy and the opening of markets to competition.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Integrated coastal zone management: four entrenched illusions]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/75/2008/sapiens-1-75-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Integrated coastal zone management: four entrenched illusions
                    R. Billé
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 75-86, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-75-2008, 2008
                        The considerable efforts undertaken on all continents to
carry out field experiments and refine the concept of Integrated Coastal
Zone Management (ICZM) have resulted in its adoption as the key paradigm for
the sustainable development of coastal areas. Having reached a first phase
of maturity, ICZM should now be challenged by critical assessments if it is
to advance both theoretically and operationally. In this perspective, our
paper highlights four deep-rooted illusions: the illusion that round table
discussions can solve any problem, the coastal manager myth, the community
illusion and the positivist illusion. It is argued that these illusions
result from unproved conceptual over-simplifications and lead to a naive
conception of action that often impedes ICZM implementation.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The transformative value of ecological pragmatism: an introduction to the work of Bryan G. Norton]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/51/2008/sapiens-1-51-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    The transformative value of ecological pragmatism: an introduction to the work of Bryan G. Norton
                    H.-S. Afeissa
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 51-57, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-51-2008, 2008
                        In the space of only a few years, Bryan Norton has become one of the
essential actors of environmental ethics through his launching of what has
become one of its dominant trends: environmental pragmatism. Environmental
pragmatism refuses to take a stance in the dispute between the defenders of
anthropocentrist ethics and the supporters of nonanthropocentrist ethics.
Instead, Norton prefers to distinguish between
"strong anthropocentrism'' and "weak- or extended- anthropocentrism'' and
develops the idea that only the latter is capable of not under-estimating
the diversity of instrumental values that humans may derive from the natural
world. The practical difference between these two kinds of theories is
considerable.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/59/2008/sapiens-1-59-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue
                    P.-M. Boulanger
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 59-73, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008, 2008
                        Social indicators, and therefore sustainable development indicators also,
are scientific constructs whose principal objective is to inform public
policy-making. Their usefulness is dependant on trade-offs between
scientific soundness and rigor, political effectiveness and democratic
legitimacy. The paper considers in this perspective three important stages
in the building of sustainable development indicators: the identification of
the various dimensions underlying the concept of sustainable development,
the process of aggregating lower dimension indicators in higher level
composite indices and the attribution of weights at various levels of the
indicators hierarchy. More specifically, it assesses the relative
fruitfulness for indicators construction of the four most widespread
conceptions of sustainable development, in terms of domains or pillars
(economy, society, and environment), in terms of resources and productive
assets (manufactured, natural, human and social capitals), in terms of human
well-being (needs, capabilities) or in terms of norms (efficiency, fairness,
prudence...). It concludes with a plea for the construction of
synthetic indices able to compete with and complement the GNP as an
indicator of development.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Theories of intergenerational justice: a synopsis]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/39/2008/sapiens-1-39-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Theories of intergenerational justice: a synopsis
                    A. Gosseries
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 39-49, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-39-2008, 2008
                        In this paper, the author offers a
synoptic view of different theories of
intergenerational justice, along two dimensions
(savings/dissavings) and three modalities
(prohibition, authorisation, obligation). After
presenting successively the indirect reciprocity,
the mutual advantage, the utilitarian and the
Lockean approaches, special attention is given to
the egalitarian theory of intergenerational
justice. Two key differences between the
egalitarian view on intergenerational justice and
the sufficientarian interpretation of
sustainability are highlighted.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:52:00 +0200</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Our energy for the future]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/37/2008/sapiens-1-37-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Our energy for the future
                    C. Mandil
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 37-38, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-37-2008, 2008
                        No abstract available.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change: contents, insights and assessment of the critical debate]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/17/2008/sapiens-1-17-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change: contents, insights and assessment of the critical debate
                    O. Godard
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 17-36, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-17-2008, 2008
                        Sir Nicholas Stern, former Chief economist of the World Bank, was asked by
the British government to lead a review on the economics of global climate
change. The Stern Review was published in October 2006 and attracted a great
deal of attention from various circles, from academic to NGOs and the media
in Europe, but also worldwide. This article aims first to highlight the
Review's main points and to single out a selection of the most significant
factual data and quantitative evaluations that make up the Review's rich
contribution to the subject, going beyond the well-publicised striking
results in which the possible damages of climate change are compared to the
impact of the two world wars of the 20th century, but lasting forever. The
survey concludes with reflections on criticism of the Stern Review made by
several economists, mostly in the US, regarding the integrated assessment
modelling exercise included in the Review. The most consequential criticisms
are related to the low discount rate used to tackle this very long-term
issue and the treatment of adaptation of future generations to a new global
climate. Paradoxically, the much-attacked choice of a low discount rate
chosen to ensure an equal treatment of the utility of all generations is the
best-grounded in the utilitarian philosophy that underpins the type of
economics that both the Stern Review and most of its critics share.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Indoor air pollution, health and economic well-being]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/1/2008/sapiens-1-1-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    Indoor air pollution, health and economic well-being
                    E. Duflo, M. Greenstone, and R. Hanna
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 1-9, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-1-2008, 2008
                        Indoor air pollution (IAP) caused by solid fuel use and/or traditional
cooking stoves is a global health threat, particularly for women and young
children. The WHO World Health Report 2002 estimates that IAP is responsible
for 2.7% of the loss of disability adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide
and 3.7% in high-mortality developing countries. Despite the magnitude of
this problem, social scientists have only recently begun to pay closer
attention to this issue and to test strategies for reducing IAP. In this
paper, we provide a survey of the current literature on the relationship
between indoor air pollution, respiratory health and economic well-being. We
then discuss the available evidence on the effectiveness of popular policy
prescriptions to reduce IAP within the household.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy]]></title>
                <link>http://www.surv-perspect-integr-environ-soc.net/1/11/2008/sapiens-1-11-2008.html</link>
                <description>
                    An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy
                    R. Costanza, B. Fisher, S. Ali, C. Beer, L. Bond, R. Boumans, N. L. Danigelis, J. Dickinson, C. Elliott, J. Farley, D. Elliott Gayer, L. MacDonald Glenn, T. R. Hudspeth, D. F. Mahoney, L. McCahill, B. McIntosh, B. Reed, S. Abu Turab Rizvi, D. M. Rizzo, T. Simpatico, and R. Snapp
                        Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc., 1, 11-15, doi:10.5194/sapiens-1-11-2008, 2008
                        While Quality of Life (QOL) has long been an explicit or implicit
policy goal, adequate definition and measurement have been elusive. Diverse
"objective" and "subjective" indicators across a range of disciplines and
scales, and recent work on subjective well-being (SWB) surveys and the
psychology of happiness have spurred renewed interest. Drawing from multiple
disciplines, we present an integrative definition of QOL that combines
measures of human needs with subjective well-being or happiness. QOL is
proposed as a multi-scale, multi-dimensional concept that contains
interacting objective and subjective elements. We relate QOL to the
opportunities that are provided to meet human needs in the forms of built,
human, social and natural capital (in addition to time) and the policy
options that are available to enhance these opportunities. Issues related to
defining, measuring, and scaling these concepts are discussed, and a research
agenda is elaborated. Policy implications include strategies for investing in
opportunities to maximize QOL enhancement at the individual, community, and
national scales.
                </description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:52:00 +0100</pubDate>

            </item>
    </channel>
</rss>